*expanding relations parasite engenders through its properties in particular locations* [=/= (a philosophy of) parasite as a overgeneralized model for relationality or sociality by shifting conceptual scales via its agentive or affective capacities through (human) reflexivity]
how parasite means?
[how?] parasite can bring our conceptual life along with it from local to global concerns (about hospitality, social integration, exclusion, Other, etc.)
how to go beyond qualities (or agentive capacities) of parasite that express some timeless properties?
(Derrida’s) mode of enunciation and the literary vehicle entrusted with its exemplification:
*[…]it is sufficient to introduce, into the fold of speech acts, a few wolves of the type (“undecidability” or “unconscious”) for the shepherd to lose track of his sheep: one is no longer certain where to find the identity of the “speaker” or the “hearer,” … where to find the identity of an intention.*
what would mean for the German shepherd to lose track of his sheeps? (to go from) the fable of *the oriented sheepfold* ——to——> the fable of *losing count*]
the vexed relation between sheep and wolf, slave and master
wolf in sheep’s clothing [——> also the problem/fantasy of the “integration” project (as the space of ethics and politics)~~>(“Appearances are deceptive” ==> exclusion of the parasite + identification of subjects as the task of responsibility)